Font pairings / Interfaces

Nunito + Lato

Nunito & Lato

Explore the six-trait profile and scores ↓
Heading: NunitoBody: Lato
Pair preview

Less noise. More meaning.

Good letters give ideas room to breathe. They help us find a rhythm, bring what matters into focus, and tell a story in our own voice.

Click the text and make it yours.

Heading · Nunito
Body · Lato
One available weight

Modern

Why it works

Nunito establishes a clear heading hierarchy, while Lato organises paragraphs with simpler sans-serif forms. Both belong to the same category: distinguish their roles through size and spacing. Start at 48 px for headings and 18 px for paragraphs. This is a profile-based suggestion: judge it on your own content.

Learn how to judge contrast and roles in a pairing, then adapt the size scale to your layout.

Download both fonts and their licenses. The CSS paths are examples — adjust them to your project.

Find another pairing

THE MATCH / 6 PAIRING TRAITS

This pairing has a personality.

Same questions. Same scores. See how we match type.

This is the pairing’s profile. Answer six questions to see your personal match score.

Find my fonts

01 / WEIGHT 20%

Style

Warm 75/100
75/100
Neutral 100/100
100/100
Cool 25/100
25/100
Why does it matter?

Think beyond colour. What feelings should your project leave behind? Warm and welcoming, or cool and matter-of-fact? Choose neutral if you have no preference.

02 / WEIGHT 15%

Headline length

Headlines with lots and lots of words 53/100
53/100
Headlines with words 97/100
97/100
Headlines! 47/100
47/100
Why does it matter?

How many words will your headings contain? A short title leaves more room for expressive type. Longer headlines need a quieter rhythm and readable letters.

03 / WEIGHT 10%

Font familiarity

Very familiar 69/100
69/100
Seen it around 81/100
81/100
Something new! 31/100
31/100
Why does it matter?

Would you prefer a familiar face, an occasional sighting or a less obvious discovery? This is an editorial estimate of familiarity, not measured internet usage.

04 / WEIGHT 20%

Type of content

Professional 49/100
49/100
Balanced 99/100
99/100
Easy-going 51/100
51/100
Why does it matter?

Content sets the tone. Professional projects need credibility and composure; a casual story can make room for more personality. What character does your content have?

05 / WEIGHT 20%

Headlines

Informative 54/100
54/100
Versatile 96/100
96/100
Decorative 46/100
46/100
Why does it matter?

Should a headline primarily communicate, balance clarity with character, or decorate the page? This helps us decide how expressive the heading typeface should be.

06 / WEIGHT 15%

Taking a chance

Yes 38/100
38/100
Perhaps… 88/100
88/100
No 62/100
62/100
Why does it matter?

There is a land of unusual typefaces below. Would you jump? Tell us how far we can go, from quiet letters to a bold, unexpected personality.

How are the scores calculated?

For each selected answer we read its compatibility points from the pairing matrix. Mismatch is 100 minus those points. We square each mismatch and multiply it by the question weight. We divide the sum by the total active weight, take the square root and subtract it from 100. A distinctly weak trait therefore matters more than it would in a simple average.

score = 100 − √(Σ[weight × (100 − points)²] / Σ[active weights])

Base question weights: 20, 15, 10, 20, 20 and 15. Neutral style means no preference: we exclude that trait and renormalise the remaining weights. Its 100 matrix points are not a bonus. The result is a matching heuristic, not a probability or font quality rating.

Pairing profiles combine heading traits (80%) and body traits (20%); content type uses a 60/40 blend. Familiarity is an editorial estimate. Required characters for the selected language and a pinned font are filters applied before ranking.

We sort by full-precision scores and display one decimal place. Identical point profiles are grouped. From the remainder we choose up to three suggestions with different headings, unless a heading is pinned. Exact ties are ordered by ID; that does not imply an aesthetic advantage.

A suggestion derived from style profiles. Judge the final composition on your own text.

Privacy